Well, it’s been awhile since either of us have posted on WordPress. We’ve been pretty busy with our lives, but never too far from what the media forces down our throats. I’m not a fan of the four-letter network or any of their counterparts, but all of the conference shuffling has been heavily on my mind.
Sawdog and I have been discussing the collegiate issues at hand, and I felt moved to write something. Here is a question and answer session for all who care to read. Please note that the questions are pretty random, and the answers are only opinions.
1. What is the future of the SEC Conference for basketball and football?
Well let’s stick to football first here, since it’s football that is driving realignment. I think the future is what many are expecting–a 16 team league. I really do think in the end there will be four mega-conferences controlling the majority of the money brought in from college football. It almost seems unstoppable at this point. An even more compelling question is this: Could the four mega-conferences (with 64 teams) branch away from NCAA governance and have their own national championship? I confess I don’t have any insider knowledge on this, but I’ve heard it rumored and it’s something to keep on your radar. If so, does a school like Notre Dame finally try and join one of these mega-conferences so they are included in the new system?? Hard to claim a national championship if you’re an independent not included in the party…
Along those same lines, basketball could become the same. Basketball should make enough revenue to keep the same alignment that football drives when it’s all said and done. That means that if there are four megaconferences made of 64 teams, and the leagues can somehow branch away from NCAA rules, those 64 teams would play each other for the championship. All speculation, but interesting to think about!
2. What is the best team to add to the SEC?
Well the best option was Texas A&M, and that already happened. It made too much sense for both the school and the SEC. This is a complicated question which requires each of us to understand geopolitics and much more. For example schools such as Florida, Georgia, Kentucky and South Carolina currently enjoy a revenue and exposure advantage with SEC television contracts over in state rivals Florida State, Georgia Tech, Louisville and Clemson, respectively. So as much as you might sit around and dream of the SEC becoming even more competitive with a school like Florida State, Florida has the power to veto their addition into the conference. And likewise for the other three schools mentioned. However the current SEC schools will listen to expansion talks if they believe adding a new school from a new television market will bring in more revenue that can be shared for everyone. So this is why the most likely candidates for addition as the 14th school in the SEC would be Missouri (St Louis TV market) or a school like Virginia Tech (Virginia and Washington DC TV markets). This week Missouri publicly stated they have no current interest to join the SEC, so expect some heat to pick up in negotiations with a school like Virginia Tech which brings a very nice television market, has a very loyal fanbase and would certainly increase the academic reputation of the SEC.
3. What is Texas’ future?
Texas is holding a lot of cards these days–a Royal Flush, in fact. The recent television deal with ESPN called the Longhorn Network has shaken the foundation of college football greatly. The reality is that Texas is so popular that everybody would love to have a piece of them–ESPN, the Pac-10, the Big-10, etc. However, what exactly do any new conferences present for Texas what they don’t already have with their ESPN tv deal?? That’s what Texas will want answers to. It’s understandable that an apathetic football league like the PAC-10 (when compared to the SEC and Big 10, certainly) would want to reach out to Texas and add them into the mix. It would immediately increase revenue through television deals and make the PAC-10 as formidable a football conference as the SEC and Big-10 (especially if Oklahoma and two others join in). Texas will want some sort of extra compensation though, understandably. Texas would be doing a lot more for the PAC-10 then the PAC-10 is doing for Texas. That’s just how powerful they are financially–now and for the foreseeable future. Because Texas will most likely draw larger crowds throughout PAC-10 stadiums it’s possible Texas may pitch an idea to the PAC-10 that they should collect a percentage of the revenues that occur in opposing stadiums. That’s a random idea of the top of my head, but the point still stands: Texas doesn’t want to share revenues equally when they already enjoy the competitive advantage they have through the Longhorn Network. Any conference that adds Texas will have to concede some additional power to the Longhorns to make it all work. One factor that could eventually force Texas’ hand to join a conference is this idea of having four 16 team Mega-conferences. Those 64 teams could consider having their own national championship–admittedly through legalities that are over my head–and you don’t want to be an independent on the outside looking in. Those are discussions for another day, however. I think Texas will be content to stay fat and happy on their new Longhorn Network deal while other less fortunate schools jump for greener pastures. In the end I see Texas in a situation where one of these conferences (PAC-10, Big 10, etc) has 15 teams and only needs one extra team to make it a perfect 16. That’s when all the cards Texas holds will be most valuable, when a conference knows they can cap their realignment off with some icing and reel in the big fish with a fair deal for both parties.
4. What is the Big 12’s future?
The Big 12 is hanging on with nine teams, and what was once a league on life support is now a league that is in critical but stable condition. The loss of Texas and Oklahoma would destroy this league. There is no way around that. It is encouraging for the Big 12 that Texas, Oklahoma and Missouri have continued to resist departure in recent weeks. But make no mistake the longer the Big 12 waits to solidify their standing as a power league, the more likely other leagues will offer a sweet deal that will be hard to pass up. The Big 12 should be feeling an awful lot of heat right now. They are geographically surrounded by the Big-10 who has the highest number of college football fans of any league in the nation and thus can afford to be patient and picky with adding stellar teams into the league. I think the inability to add geographically reasonable teams (because they are already in the Big 10 or SEC nearby) is going to severely limit the Big-12’s status as a conference that can expand and thus the Big 12 will eventually die a slow death.
5. What is the Big East’s future?
There is no future. This league as a football conference is over. In the words of my good friend 49ways “this league is freaking garbage.” West Virginia tried to join the SEC but the SEC said no. It’s no wonder Syracuse and Pittsburgh bailed as fast as possible to the ACC. It’s rumored that the Big 12 may try to absorb what’s left of the Big East after a few more Big East teams (Rutgers and UConn perhaps) are plucked away. The Big 12 and the Big East are in serious football trouble. It’s so bad they are in talks to merge together to try and secure and be strong enough to secure a BCS bid. I see no future for the Big East in football.
6. Which is the best school to add to the Big East: East Carolina, Navy, Army, or other?
College football drives everything. It’s the moneymaker. The Big East is extremely poor from a football perspective. Seven of the current teams in this league that are basketball powers (Villanova, for example) don’t even compete in football. If you don’t compete in football you’re league is in trouble. I really think it is inevitable that the Big East dissolves. Basketball is not enough. It’s possible the Big 12 absorbs the remaining Big East football schools, but the Big East adding teams is a complete afterthought at this point.
7. Is Notre Dame to the ACC a possibility?
I love this question. I think the crown jewel for the ACC would be Notre Dame, and it’s speculated that Notre Dame would prefer the ACC over the Big 10 if it is forced away from independent status. Three of the top five Notre Dame television markets are on the east coast: New York, Boston and Philadelphia. So Notre Dame and the ACC are seeing the same thing: television contracts and television money. The ACC currently sits at 14 teams with the recent additions of Syracuse and Pittsburgh. If they want to reach 16 teams they can be selective, and they’ll look to new tv markets and football revenues while trying to maintain strong academics. I have a gut feeling that we are in fact going to see the ACC work out a deal with Notre Dame. It won’t make sense geographically, except for the presence of so many ND fans in the large east coast cities. And that’s what will push this through. Bold prediction: The ACC adds Rutgers and Notre Dame as the 15th and 16th teams.
8. Who else is John Calipari pursuing for 2012?
The entire top 25 recruits in the country. I don’t worry about Calapari because he’s proven. He’ll get players and put them in the NBA.
9. Who will be the leading scorer for Kentucky basketball this season?
I will say Terrance Jones just because he can do so much. He’ll get opportunities on fast breaks, he’ll get offensive rebounds and putbacks. And I have no doubt he’s improved his jumper at least a little bit which will help. I say he edges out Anthony Davis and Doron Lamb, finishing with 17.9 ppg. There will be plenty of balanced scoring with their ridiculous starting lineup.
10. What will Kentucky’s final record be in football?
The start to Kentucky’s football season has been a major disappointment. There is no reason for this team to look like they’ve never practiced together considering the coaching staff remained intact from last year and many of their players are veterans. There are few positives right now. The offensive line is healthy for the first time this year, which will help. And young contributors like RB Josh Clemons have some much needed experience under their belts. Still it’s asking too much for tremendous improvement. I’m going to be the optimistic fan and say 5-7 instead of the popular answer of 4-8. That’s the best I can do right now.